Control Station
Analysis of the Bluefin 21 AUV
Jason Bach
ASCI 605 – Unmanned Systems Sensing,
Perception, and Processing
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide
10/16/2016
The General Dynamics Bluefin 21
Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) is very capable and highly efficient and
able to carry multiple payload and sensor variations. It is a deep water AUV
able to operate for extended times below the surface of the ocean. It can be
used for surveys, search and salvage, oceanography, exploration, mine
countermeasures, and discovery of unexploded ordinance when needed (General
Dynamics, 2016). It has become well known through its efforts in the search for
Malaysia Airlines flight 370 (Makinen, 2014). The vehicle itself is over 16
feet long, 21 inches in diameter, weighs 1,650 pounds, and go to depths of
nearly 15,000 feet (General Dynamics, 2016). It is powered by a 13.5 kWh
lithium-polymer battery pack with an endurance of 25 hours with a regular
payload. Figure 1 displays the Bluefin 21 below.

Figure
1. The Bluefin 21 AUV. Adapted from http://www.bluefinrobotics.com/vehicles-batteries-and-services/bluefin-21
The control station of the Bluefin
21consists of the operator’s laptop or a ruggedized version of the laptop
provided in the package purchased. The software used is Bluefin’s Operator Tool
Suite that interfaces between the AUV and operator for all parts of the mission
(General Dynamics, 2016). It is operated on any Windows based system and
includes everything necessary to manage the AUV. Detailed mission planning can
be handled before or during the mission with vehicle status display, ship
position display, and any other displays set by the operator. Figure 2 shows
the display below. Specific commands from the customer can also be sent to the payload
interface. Communication and data transfer is done with acoustic modem, RF
modem, Wi-Fi, and Iridium with much data stored onboard and downloaded after
the mission.
Figure
2. Mission Planner software display.
Adapted from http://www.bluefinrobotics.
com/technology/operator-software/
A dashboard
tool allows the operator shipboard to track the vehicles progress and monitor
its sensors to perform any maintenance or corrective procedures while in
operation (General Dynamics, 2016). The dashboard uses the highest bandwidth
channel available allowing flow of constant information between the operator
and AUV. Figure 3 below displays a
dashboard screen shot sample. The Lantern is Bluefin 21’s software that
supports its post mission data display and analysis for the operator and
customer (General Dynamics, 2016).
Figure
3. Dasboard display. Adapted from http://www.bluefinrobotics.com/technology/operator-software/
It combines and
displays all data collected such as survey tracks, user annotations, and
vehicle data. Detected targets can be measured for height and width while also
obtaining exact positional accuracy of the target (General Dynamics, 2016). Figure
4 below shows the Lantern display.
Figure
3. Lantern display. Adapted from http://www.bluefinrobotics.com/technology/operator-software/
Negative Issues
Better acoustic communications and
improved navigation technology would be the only current weaknesses of the
Bluefin 21. Compass navigation and inertial navigation systems are the main
navigation sources with research being done with acoustic transponders mounted
to the vehicle for greater autonomy in certain isolated areas (General
Dynamics, 2016).
Conclusion/Recommended
Changes
The Bluefin 21 is a very versatile
AUV that currently employs a standard laptop display for its user interface.
All pertinent information is available throughout its mission timeframe with
much of its mission data recorded and downloaded after completion. Virtual
reality goggle technology would be a recommended option for the operator with
the possibility of a responsive joystick for certain operations. The acoustic
communications link would have to be analyzed and possibly improved upon to
ensure constant real time displays for the operator. Sensor payloads would have
to support this also with responsive wider ranges to view the current
surroundings while using the VR goggle system. This operation may have to have
some depth or other restrictions to enable a constant clear signal in the ocean
environment. The Bluefin 21 is a capable platform that will advance with
technological improvements when they are possible.
References
General Dynamics. (2016). Bluefin Robotics.
Retrieved from http://www.bluefinrobotics.com
/vehicles-batteries-and-services/bluefin-21
Makinen, J. (2014, April 14).
Malaysia airlines plane search goes underwater. Los Angeles
Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2014/apr/14/world/la-fg-malaysia-bluefin-20140415



Excellent blog on the Bluefin 21. It is a shame that the underwater communication and navigation technologies are still kind of lagging behind to that of the surface counterpart. Especially when water being a poor medium for high-speed data communication. Maybe having a fleet of Bluefin 21 would be a good option to have on hand during the Malaysia Airlines flight 370 SAR operation, i.e. to cover a wider search area in a shorter time. The idea of using VR goggles technology as the user interface will be quite unique, as one can never expect what he or she might see underwater.
ReplyDelete